The Post-Dispatch printed my letter
about their ridiculously innacurate editorial
about the European crisis. Here's my letter, which is slightly less snotty than the version I submitted.
Imaginary monetary policies
The editorial board's analysis of the European financial
crisis in "Far-away quarrels" (May 23) is way off the mark on the
situations in Europe and the United States. For example, the editorial
says that the problems in Europe are rooted in a fatal flaw in Europe's
monetary system: "a common currency, but no central bank." In fact, the
European Central Bank was established when the euro was adopted.
The editorial said that "the GOP is convinced that pure
austerity is the way to growth. It's not likely to work here any better
than it's working there." In fact, austerity is not close to being on
the table in the United States and is being pursued only in the small
number of European countries, such as Greece and Spain, that have run
out of other options. The GOP and President Barack Obama's
Bowles-Simpson commission have proposed structural reforms aimed at
establishing sustainable fiscal policies. Under the Ryan plan, for
example, federal spending as a share of GDP would rise over the next 20
years from 21.6 percent to 24 percent. Is that pure austerity?
Pure austerity is when unsustainable fiscal policies lead
to the ruin of government finances because structural reforms had not
been put in place. The United States should be having a debate about
which fiscally sustainable future we want: the Ryan and Bowles-Simpson
plans, for instance, have very different visions of how the federal
government is financed. Instead, we get editorials claiming that the
choice is between an imaginary policy of pure austerity and pro-growth
policies that are nothing of the sort.
Howard Wall • St. Charles
Director, Institute for the Study of Economics and the Environment, Lindenwood University
I made these same points in a post the other day
. The post has a bit more red meat to it.